← Catalogue

Johnson & Johnson at the Tylenol Crossroads

James Burke decides how widely to recall Tylenol capsules

By Rehearsal Pedagogy Initiative

Apply corporate responsibilities to a product-safety crisis. Students determine the scope of a Tylenol recall under uncertain risk and conflicting advice, then specify what evidence would justify changing their decision.

Format
Reflective case
Discipline
Leadership
Duration
75-minute session, with pre-class reading
Length
18 pages

Johnson & Johnson at the Tylenol Crossroads

First 2 pages

Cover of Johnson & Johnson at the Tylenol Crossroads

Teaching materials

Teaching notes and complete teaching materials require approved teaching access.

Request teaching access

Overview

Cyanide in Extra-Strength Tylenol capsules had killed seven people around Chicago, and Johnson & Johnson had recalled two lots nationwide and every bottle there. On 4 October 1982 its chairman, James Burke, put the case for recalling all Extra-Strength capsules to the FBI, where officials opposed a recall for fear of panic. He estimated the cost of a national recall at about $100 million, none of it insured.

The Credo, rewritten in 1979 after Burke had executives argue against it line by line, put users of the company's products first, employees second, communities third and stockholders fourth. Employees and retirees also held shares through profit-sharing programmes. People in the company who wanted no wider recall said the Credo's first responsibility should be balanced against its second and third, since a nationwide recall would mean layoffs at McNeil, which made Tylenol.

On that reasoning, the Credo and the cost analysis supported the same narrower recall. Burke's meeting at the Food and Drug Administration was next, and no national recall had been announced. Learners write in this edition as they read.

Includes an interactive artefact or workbook to support the learner’s thinking.*
*Some artefacts need AI access, available through Rehearsal OS.

Learning objectives

  • Check whether the priorities you started with decided the recommendation you made for Burke.
  • Separate what the case records up to 4 October 1982 from what you already believed about how the Tylenol crisis ended.
  • State what your recommendation for Johnson & Johnson would cost the group you would protect last.